FDA Update On Trasylol

On Thursday, October 25th, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) stated that Trasylol, a drug used during heart bypass surgery to prevent severe bleeding, increases the risk of death as compared to other drugs. The FDA’s announcement was based on a Canadian study that compared Trasylol’s effectiveness and safety with two other drugs.  Although the study was halted, preliminary results revealed that Trasylol increases the risk of death in patients treated for heart bypass surgery.

Trasylol (generic name aprotinin) works by blocking enzymes that dissolve blood clots.  Bayer maintains that Trasylol is safe and effective, but stated that the company would work with the FDA and regulatory agencies in other countries to determine the drug’s risks, and any necessary label changes.  The FDA said that label updates and other mandatory actions may occur.  (A “black box” warning is the strongest label warning given.)

The FDA began closely re-examining Trasylol’s safety after two January, 2006 studies linked it to kidney problems, heart attacks, strokes and other side effects. More recent studies have suggested the drug also raises the risk of death.  Bayer actually withheld one of those studies from the FDA because of what a company investigation called a “regrettable human error.”

©2007 Angel Reyes
www.ReyesLaw.com
Trackbacks (0) Links to blogs that reference this article Trackback URL
http://www.angelreyesblog.com/admin/trackback/110997
Comments (3) Read through and enter the discussion with the form at the end
Eric Clark - October 29, 2007 5:05 AM

One thing I haven't understood in all the coverage is this: with the stroke risk, does it mean that stroke takes place immediately or soon after? Or can the stroke be a consequence weeks or even months later?
Would love to know the answer.

Angel Reyes - October 29, 2007 9:05 AM

That's a great question that experts around the country are still trying to answer. As we get more information, we'll post it.

Angel

l. lewis - October 29, 2007 10:02 AM

I'd love to know how they "innocently" withheld that risk info from FDA and are trying to blame the research company they'd contracted to to the initial research.
THings that make you go "Hmmmmm".

Post A Comment / Question Use this form to add a comment to this entry.







Remember personal info?
Send To A Friend Use this form to send this entry to a friend via email.





Angel Reyes on Twitter

@angelreyes3

most recent Twitter posts
    My Book Hispanic Heresy book

    Order a copy

    Latest Videos